Barbour v. Adams
Barbour v. Adams
Opinion
Leon A. Barbour, Jr., formerly a federal prisoner, appeals the magistrate judge’s * order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Barbour’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Barbour v. Adams, No. 3:05-cv-00219-MHL (E.D.Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.