United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6603
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
MICHAEL J. SMITH, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:01-cr-00067-JBF-AL)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Michael J. Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. 4:01-cr-00067-JBF-AL (E.D.
Va. Mar. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.