Amar Bey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claim that his employer violated Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) and that his union breached its duty of fair representation regarding his termination. The district court construed his complaint to be a “hybrid 301” action under the LMRA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. UPS, No. 5:05-cv-00208 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.