U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Rodriquez v. Fahey

Rodriquez v. Fahey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 8, 2006

Rodriquez v. Fahey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6706

EDDIE M. RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:05-cv-01503-TSE)

Submitted: August 18, 2006 Decided: September 8, 2006

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie M. Rodriquez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Eddie M. Rodriquez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriquez v. Fahey, No. 1:05-cv-01503-TSE (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.