U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Taylor v. Stansberry

Taylor v. Stansberry
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 13, 2006

Taylor v. Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6325

OSCAR LEE TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; HARLEY LAPPIN; P. GUANJA, Regional Director; A. GONZALES, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:06-hc-00023-BO)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 13, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oscar Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Oscar Lee Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-00023-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.