U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Dureke

United States v. Dureke
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 12, 2006 · Niemeyer, King, Shedd
199 F. App'x 296

United States v. Dureke

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Margaret Dike Dureke appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See *297 United States v. Dureke, No. 1:92-cr-00013-JCC-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.