U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Sorto v. Polk

Sorto v. Polk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 12, 2006

Sorto v. Polk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7063

JULIO ZELAYA SORTO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MARVIN POLK, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. P. Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00113-WLO)

Submitted: August 18, 2006 Decided: September 12, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julio Zelaya Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Julio Zelaya Sorto seeks to appeal the order of the magistrate judge deeming Sorto’s response to a Roseboro* notice deficient and striking the response without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Sorto seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975).

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.