Pearson v. United States District Court for the District of Maryland
Opinion
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. U.S. Dist. Ct., Md., No. 1:05-cv-03317-RDB (D.Md. Jan. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Demetric Gray PEARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF MARYLAND; State of Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished