U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Harris v. Maldonado

Harris v. Maldonado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 29, 2006 · Widener, Wilkinson, Hamilton
201 F. App'x 166

Harris v. Maldonado

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lamar Harris, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Maldonado, No. 3:04-cv-00100-HFF (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.