Harris v. Maldonado

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Harris v. Maldonado, 201 F. App'x 166 (4th Cir. 2006)

Harris v. Maldonado

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Lamar Harris, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Maldonado, No. 3:04-cv-00100-HFF (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Patrick Lamar HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. G. MALDONADO, Jr., Warden; John Ashcroft, the United States Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished