Gillis v. Hunt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gillis v. Hunt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6682

CLARENCE GILLIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORA HUNT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Magistrate Judge. (5:05-hc-00696-D)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: September 29, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Gillis, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Clarence Gillis seeks to appeal Respondent’s motion for

summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949).

The filing Gillis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished