Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Consideration of some rights concerning nunc pro tunc” and accompanying submissions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. 3:99-cv-00683-RLW (E.D.Va. June 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.