Kamara v. Gonzales
Kamara v. Gonzales
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1033
AMINATA BUBU KAMARA,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-679-571)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 25, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Lindsay L. Chichester, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Aminata Bubu Kamara, a native and citizen of Sierra
Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying as untimely and numerically barred her
motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the
record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse
its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kamara, No.
A70-679-571 (B.I.A. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished