Kamara v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kamara v. Gonzales

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1033

AMINATA BUBU KAMARA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-679-571)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 25, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Lindsay L. Chichester, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Aminata Bubu Kamara, a native and citizen of Sierra

Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying as untimely and numerically barred her

motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the

record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2

(a), (c) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kamara, No.

A70-679-571 (B.I.A. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished