United States v. Barefoot

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Barefoot

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7980

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cv-888-H)

Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district

court’s granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment and

denying Barefoot’s motion to quash the Government’s civil

complaint. The district court awarded the Government a declaratory

judgment and injunctive relief and imposed on Barefoot a $20,000

civil fine in this case arising under

18 U.S.C. §§ 287

, 1345(a)

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Barefoot, No. 5:04-cv-888-H (E.D.N.C.

Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished