United States v. Barefoot
United States v. Barefoot
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7980
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cv-888-H)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district
court’s granting the Government’s motion for summary judgment and
denying Barefoot’s motion to quash the Government’s civil
complaint. The district court awarded the Government a declaratory
judgment and injunctive relief and imposed on Barefoot a $20,000
civil fine in this case arising under
18 U.S.C. §§ 287, 1345(a)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Barefoot, No. 5:04-cv-888-H (E.D.N.C.
Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished