Scible v. Haines

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Scible v. Haines, 201 F. App'x 957 (4th Cir. 2006)
Hamilton, King, Per Curiam, Traxler

Scible v. Haines

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence E. Scible appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scible v. Haines, No. 2:04-cv-00092-REM (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lawrence E. SCIBLE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. William HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent—Appellee
Status
Unpublished