Croley v. Hunting Creek Club Condominium Ass'n
Opinion
John Croley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Croley v. Hunting Creek Club Condominium Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-01326-CMH (E.D.Va. Dec. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John CROLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HUNTING CREEK CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Defendant—Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished