Cofield v. Federal Bureau Prisons
Cofield v. Federal Bureau Prisons
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7121
KEENAN KESTER COFIELD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00697-CCB)
Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keenan Kester Cofield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Keenan Kester Cofield seeks to attack his federal
sentence under
28 U.S.C. § 2241(2000). The district court
dismissed the § 2241 petition without prejudice, because Cofield
was not in federal custody at the time he filed the petition.
Cofield appeals from the district court’s subsequent order denying
his motion to supplement, amend, or reconsider the denial of his
§ 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Cofield v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No.
1:06-cv-00697-CCB (D. Md. June 14, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished