Cofield v. Federal Bureau Prisons

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Cofield v. Federal Bureau Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7121

KEENAN KESTER COFIELD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00697-CCB)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keenan Kester Cofield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Keenan Kester Cofield seeks to attack his federal

sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000). The district court

dismissed the § 2241 petition without prejudice, because Cofield

was not in federal custody at the time he filed the petition.

Cofield appeals from the district court’s subsequent order denying

his motion to supplement, amend, or reconsider the denial of his

§ 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Cofield v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No.

1:06-cv-00697-CCB (D. Md. June 14, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished