Patterson v. VA Dept Corrections

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Patterson v. VA Dept Corrections

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6896

LARRY EDWIN PATTERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cv-00335-JRS)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 2, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Edwin Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Edwin Patterson filed a notice of appeal, alleging

that the district court “ignored” his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion

for reconsideration of the denial of his

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000)

petition. Subsequently, the district court denied the petition,

and Patterson did not file another notice of appeal. Patterson’s

premature notice of appeal is ineffective to appeal the subsequent

order by the district court. In re Bryson,

406 F.3d 284, 288-89

(4th Cir. 2005) (outlining circumstances when a premature notice of

appeal will be considered effective). Because Patterson did not

appeal an actual order by the district court, we dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished