Coffey v. Stansberry
Coffey v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6882
CHARLES EDWARD COFFEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise M. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02047-FL)
Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 2, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Edward Coffey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Edward Coffey, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Coffey v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02047-FL
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished