U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Neal

United States v. Neal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 11, 2006 · Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler
202 F. App'x 646

United States v. Neal

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilbert Anthony Neal appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for correction of judgment and his motion for reconsideration of the denial of that motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Neal, No. 2:94-cr-00300-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2006 & entered Mar. 1, 2006; May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.