Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah
Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1418
JULIO PARDO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, LLC, a/k/a Washington Savannah River Company, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (1:04-cv-01709-JRM)
Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julio Pardo, Appellant Pro Se. John Hagood Tighe, Edward Brandon Gaskins, FISHER & PHILLIPS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Julio Pardo appeals the district court’s order granting
Westinghouse Savannah River Company, LLC, summary judgment and
dismissing his employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant
to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, with
prejudice.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., LLC, No.
1:04-cv-01709-JRM (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to adjudication by a magistrate judge.
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished