Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1418

JULIO PARDO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, LLC, a/k/a Washington Savannah River Company, LLC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (1:04-cv-01709-JRM)

Submitted: September 22, 2006 Decided: October 11, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julio Pardo, Appellant Pro Se. John Hagood Tighe, Edward Brandon Gaskins, FISHER & PHILLIPS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Julio Pardo appeals the district court’s order granting

Westinghouse Savannah River Company, LLC, summary judgment and

dismissing his employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant

to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, with

prejudice.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., LLC, No.

1:04-cv-01709-JRM (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to adjudication by a magistrate judge.

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished