Proctor v. United States Parole Commission
Opinion
Maurice Cortez Proctor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Proctor v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. 1:04-cv-00055 (E.D.Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Maurice Cortez PROCTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Joseph Brooks, Warden, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished