Proctor v. United States Parole Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Proctor v. United States Parole Commission, 202 F. App'x 636 (4th Cir. 2006)
Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler

Proctor v. United States Parole Commission

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Cortez Proctor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Proctor v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. 1:04-cv-00055 (E.D.Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Maurice Cortez PROCTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Joseph Brooks, Warden, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished