U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Proctor v. United States Parole Commission

Proctor v. United States Parole Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 10, 2006 · Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Shedd, Traxler
202 F. App'x 636

Proctor v. United States Parole Commission

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Cortez Proctor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Proctor v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. 1:04-cv-00055 (E.D.Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.