Holden v. Stansberry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Holden v. Stansberry, 202 F. App'x 605 (4th Cir. 2006)

Holden v. Stansberry

Opinion

*606 PER CURIAM.

Rudolph Holden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Holden v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02004-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rudolph HOLDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY; Harley Lappin; P. Guanja, Regional Director; A. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished