Holden v. Stansberry
Opinion
Rudolph Holden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Holden v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02004-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Rudolph HOLDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY; Harley Lappin; P. Guanja, Regional Director; A. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished