Duncan v. Solomon
Duncan v. Solomon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6824
WILLIAM DUNCAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
L. M. SOLOMON; J. N. VAUGHAN; WILLIAM CARROLL, JR.; W. C VINSON; B. COTTON; D. GLOVER, Lt.; D. FUTRELL, Lt.; REGINALD E. MIDGETTE, Rev.; LUCIEN CAPONE, III; JAMES C. JOHNSON; LUNSFORD LONG; MATTHEW ROUSE, JR.; N. M. JAMES; GEROTHA R. SPAIN; R. R. MEWBORN; BOYD BENNETT; CHARLES STEVENS, Manager; R. C. KING; C. EDWARDS; GWEN NORVILLE; JAMES BARBER; VICTORIA HUNT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03001-H)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Duncan appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Duncan v. Solomon,
No. 5:06-ct-03001-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished