United States v. Gardner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gardner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7060

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREGORY MCGAIL GARDNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (1:99-cr-00443-TSE)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 20, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory McGail Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Joseph Rossi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Gregory McGail Gardner appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for a credit against his sentence

under

18 U.S.C. § 3585

(2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Gardner No. 1:99-

cr-00443-TSE (E.D. Va. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished