Ricks v. Fahey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ricks v. Fahey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6920

CLARENCE RICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HELEN F. FAHEY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00153-RLW)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 20, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Ricks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Clarence Ricks appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) action for failure to comply

with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Ricks v. Lahey, No. 3:06-cv-00153-RLW

(E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished