Kendall C. Watson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Watson’s motion to produce court records and trial transcripts, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v. Wells, No. l:06-cv-00038-JCC (E.D.Va. Feb. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.