United States v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 23, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. David Benjamin Joyce, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2000) and subsequent motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Moore’s

motion for reduction of sentence for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-00362-JCC

(E.D. Va. June 1, 2006). Moreover, the district court did not

abuse its discretion when it denied Moore’s motion for

reconsideration, and we affirm that order as well. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished