U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Moore

United States v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2006

United States v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7104

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 23, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. David Benjamin Joyce, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Moore’s motion for reduction of sentence for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-00362-JCC (E.D. Va. June 1, 2006). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Moore’s motion for reconsideration, and we affirm that order as well. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.