Alvin Bernard Truesdale appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Truesdale v. Ashcroft, No. 8:05-cv-00078-DCN (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 30 & Apr. 21, 2006). We deny Truesdale’s pending motions to disqualify the Defendants’ counsel, to appoint counsel for him, to hold these proceedings in abeyance or to compel, for a conference, and for publication of the opinion in this case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.