Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to remove a detainer lodged against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Akinro v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., No. 1:06-cv-00273-CCB (D. Md. June 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.