U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2006

Akinro v. Department of Homeland Security

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2006 · Niemeyer, King, Duncan

203 F. App'x 529

Counsel

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se. George William Maugans, III, Special Assistant, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Akinro v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*530 PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement to remove a detainer lodged against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Akinro v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., No. 1:06-cv-00273-CCB (D. Md. June 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.