Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton Inc
Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton Inc
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1385
CHARLES E. CALDWELL,
Petitioner,
versus
PERRY & HYLTON, INCORPORATED; WEST VIRGINIA COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (05-684-BLA)
Submitted: October 4, 2006 Decided: October 31, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold S. Albertson, Jr., Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Ashley M. Harman, William S. Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondent West Virginia CWP Fund, as insurance carrier for Perry & Hylton, Inc.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Caldwell seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s
denial of black lung benefits pursuant to
30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945(2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the Board. Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton, Inc., No. 05-684-BLA (BRB
Jan. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished