Askew v. Polk

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Askew v. Polk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6509

REGINALD ASKEW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR LIGHTSEY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MARVIN L. POLK; V. MCCULLOUGH; MICHAEL V. NORRIS; D. J. METIKO, Doctor,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00022-H)

Submitted: September 29, 2006 Decided: November 9, 2006

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth P. McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Reginald Askew appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Askew v. Polk,

No. 5:05-ct-00022-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished