Askew v. Polk
Askew v. Polk
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6509
REGINALD ASKEW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
DOCTOR LIGHTSEY, Defendant - Appellee, and
MARVIN L. POLK; V. MCCULLOUGH; MICHAEL V. NORRIS; D. J. METIKO, Doctor, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00022-H)
Submitted: September 29, 2006 Decided: November 9, 2006
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth P. McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM: Reginald Askew appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Askew v. Polk, No. 5:05-ct-00022-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.