McDonald v. Friend
McDonald v. Friend
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7208
PAUL MCDONALD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LIEUTENANT R. FRIEND; OFFICER SHIMKO; SERGEANT PERRY; TICHNELL, Chief of Security; JACOBS, Mailroom Official; LIOBEL, Mailroom Official; JON GALLEY, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06- cv-00968-PJM)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Paul McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying in part and granting in part his motion to supplement his claim and denying his motion for a court order authorizing the use of certified mail for all of his outgoing legal mail. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order McDonald seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.