Abdul Ali v. Bennett
Opinion
Sharif Abdul Ali appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ali v. Bennett, No. 5:04-ct-00948-FL (E.D.N.C. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Sharif ABDUL ALI, A/K/A Vincent Bradford Earl, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT, Director of Prisons; Michael Bell, Superintendent; Susan Rhyne-White, Superintendent of Programs; J. Johnson, Sgt., Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished