Ziadeh v. Stuffregen
Ziadeh v. Stuffregen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6397
JOSEPH ZIADEH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
W. DAVID STUFFREGEN; MONUMENTAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cv-00787-RLW)
Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for failure to pay the filing fee and denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the district court’s previous order denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ziadeh v. Stuffregen, No. 3:05-cv-00787-RLW (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.