Hines v. United States Govt
Hines v. United States Govt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1319
PRISCILLA HINES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Social Security Agency Retirement Litigation Branch,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cv-00726-FL)
Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Priscilla Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Priscilla Hines appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint seeking social security benefits and
denying her mandamus petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hines v. United States, No.
5:04-cv-00726-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2006). We deny Hines’ motion
for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished