Hines v. United States Govt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hines v. United States Govt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1319

PRISCILLA HINES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Social Security Agency Retirement Litigation Branch,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cv-00726-FL)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Priscilla Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Priscilla Hines appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her complaint seeking social security benefits and

denying her mandamus petition. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Hines v. United States, No.

5:04-cv-00726-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2006). We deny Hines’ motion

for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished