George Matos Rocha appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. “Rule 36 authorizes a court to correct only clerical errors in the transcription of judgments.” United States v. Werber, 51 F.3d 342, 343 (2d Cir. 1995). Because the district court correctly determined that there was no such clerical error in the transcription of the judgment in this case, the court properly denied Rocha’s motion. Finding no error, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Rocha, No. 1:99-cr-00326-JAB (M.D.N.C. May 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED