Bisong v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bisong v. Gonzales

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1408

BRIDGET TABI BISONG,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A74-674-080)

Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: November 15, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lindsay L. Chichester, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bridget Tabi Bisong, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) denying as untimely her motion to reopen

immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the

Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion

in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty,

502 U.S. 314, 323-24

(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for

the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Bisong, No.

A74-674-080 (B.I.A. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished