Appellants are members of a proposed class of individuals who possessed ownership interests in industrial life insurance policies allegedly issued by defendants on a racially discriminatory basis. The district court denied their motion for class certification, concluding that, because defendants’ statuteof-limitations defense could not be resolved on a class-wide basis, issues common to the class did not predominate over individual ones. Appellants appealed the denial of certification, and we placed the case in abeyance pending resolution of Thorn v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., 445 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2006). The opinion in Thorn has now issued, holding on facts materially indistinguishable from those presented here, that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying certification where the defendant’s statute-of-limitations defense could not, for reasons identical to those relied upon by the district court here, be resolved on a class-wide basis. Because this case is controlled by Thom, and for the reasons stated therein, we grant the motion for summary affirmance, grant the motion to submit the appeal on the briefs, affirm the judgment of the district court, and remand for further proceedings on appellants’ individual claims. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. *

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.