United States v. Ussery

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ussery

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7424

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGINALD LAMONT USSERY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-95-1F)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: December 1, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel specific performance of a plea

agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Ussery, No. 5:94-cr-95-1F

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished