United States v. Martin
United States v. Martin
207 F. App'x 347
United States v. Martin
Opinion
Lorenzo Grode Martin appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martin, No. 1:00-cr-00226-TSE (E.D.Va. May 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.