Egan v. Holt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Egan v. Holt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7065

EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GERALD R. HOLT, Sheriff; DOCTOR JOHN PRITTY; DOCTOR EDWIN PALVERNIO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00280)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 30, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward James Egan, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edward James Egan, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Egan’s motion for appointment of counsel and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Egan v. Holt,

No. 7:05-cv-00280 (W.D. Va. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished