Smith v. Harrison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Harrison

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6040

HAROLD SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEVE HARRISON, Associate Warden; FRANK SPOON, Factory Manager; JERRY DEMPSEY, Foreman; MONROE, Foreman; RICKY GAULT, Foreman; ELMORE BUTCH HARRIS, Assistant Safety Manager; JOHN DOE, Property Owner; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-1188-6)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 29, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harold Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Harrison, No. CA-

04-1188-6 (D.S.C. Dec. 7, 2005). Smith’s motion for appointment of

counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished