Reuter v. Washington County Supervisors

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Reuter v. Washington County Supervisors

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1981

JOSE F. REUTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WASHINGTON COUNTY SUPERVISORS; GREGORY I. SNOOK, President; DAVID ENGLE, Director, Washington County Department of Social Services; JOHN KENNEDY, Program Manager; PAULA PRICE, LCSW-C Adult Protection Agency, Washington County Department of Social Services; ANN BUSHONG, Case Manager Supervisor, Washington County Department of Social Services; LYNN M. SMITH, Case Manager, Washington County Department of Social Services; ALICE SENCINDIVER, RN, Washington County Health Department; BRENDA MILLER, Washington County Hospital Home Health Care; ELISE CULLER, Director as Superior Respondent; RAY BELEN, Physical Therapist Home Health Care, CAROLYN FLEENOR, Home Health Care; IFY ONYIA, Director Superior Respondent, MARTA FEIGLY; SUSAN J. MCDONALD, Washington County Commission of Aging; TIMOTHY S. GORDON, P. A.; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE; DAWN MORALES; JUDY BARRON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

PAUL THEODONI, M.D., in his individual and official capacity,

Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00334-CCB)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose F. Reuter, Appellant Pro Se. Kirk Chalis Downey, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Hagerstown, Maryland; Elise Song Kurlander, Christopher A. Gozdor, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; William John Hickey, Rockville, Maryland; James Sunderland Aist, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland; John Michael Quinn, ETHRIDGE, QUINN, MCAULIFFE, ROWAN & HARTINGER, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Jose F. Reuter appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Reuter v. Washington

County Supervisors, No. 1:06-cv-00334-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006).

We further grant Reuter’s unopposed motion to dismiss Paul

Theodoni, M.D., as a party to the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished