O'Connor v. Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

O'Connor v. Young

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1800

CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, Individually and in his capacity as chief judge; MORRIS E. LASKER, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; CONRAD K. CYR, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; SANDRA L. LYNCH, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; KERMIT V. LIPEZ, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Senator; JOHN KERRY, Senator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00331-JRS)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil action against several federal judges, the

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and its Senators, for lack of

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny O’Connor’s motion for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by

the district court. See O’Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00331-JRS

(E.D. Va. June 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 3 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished