O'Connor v. Young
O'Connor v. Young
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1800
CAROLYN E. O’CONNOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM G. YOUNG, Individually and in his capacity as chief judge; MORRIS E. LASKER, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; CONRAD K. CYR, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; SANDRA L. LYNCH, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; KERMIT V. LIPEZ, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Senator; JOHN KERRY, Senator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00331-JRS)
Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn E. O’Connor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Carolyn E. O’Connor appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action against several federal judges, the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and its Senators, for lack of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny O’Connor’s motion for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. See O’Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00331-JRS
(E.D. Va. June 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished