Hull v. Baltimore City Comm College

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hull v. Baltimore City Comm College

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1874

ADONICA Q. HULL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE; AFSCME 92,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-01439-WDQ)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adonica Q. Hull, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Adonica Q. Hull appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as untimely filed her employment discrimination action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hull v. Baltimore City Cmty. Coll., No. 1:06-cv-01439-WDQ

(D. Md. July 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished