Christopher Lee Thomas appeals district court orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion and his Rule 59 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United *452 States v. Thomas, No. 1:99-cr-00477-CMH (E.D. Va. filed June 13, 2006), and entered June 14, 2006; Aug. 18, 2006. We deny Thomas’ motion for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.